Draft Dmac or J Long???


DieHardRaiderNJ
DieHardRaiderNJ's picture

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Report DieHardRaiderNJ

Am i the only guy out there who thinks that drafting McFadden would be a mistake if Jake Long is still available??? The o-line is the only weak link. The defense is gonna crush everyone, watch im calling it now, rob ryan is the man!! Fargas is solid, bush was nasty in college until his injury - hes a sleeper, and rhodes is like a C+ or a 85 overall if you play madden - hes a role player that will pick up slack. but without a solid LT all the hopes for any solid offensive production will be lost.

Average: 5 (1 vote)
Raiderjoseph
Raiderjoseph's picture

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Report Raiderjoseph

Long will not be available at 4. I really think we will trade down and that DMAC will not be a Raider. We are going to have a second round pick and will improve the offense (reciever, linemen), but our "needs" revolve around linebacker, backup QB, and impact offensive linemen. I think that our lines on both sides of the ball will be a surprise. But Sam Williams needs to step up. This draft is for depth, and I believe that we will get a lot of athletes that people will call projects, but this is actually a perfect Al Davis scenario: draft for size and speed. Having said that I believe that we will get Chris Johnson as a RB/returner in the second or third and he will be phenominal for us. Most of what we are going to do has been done in free agency. Kwame Harris will be solid in this scheme. Cable did wonders last year (remember the year before), I am not really worried about them. We need a couple of recievers, Johnnie Lee looked unsure of himself last year. We need physical specimens at reciever. other than that we are ok. No to DMAC!!

If You aint a Raider Fan, You aint Sh**

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate the change.